OpenDataScope, home

Compare portals

Choose two to four national portals. Each row shows whether its values can be compared directly.

National portals use different definitions and classification systems, so every comparison is marked Direct, Partial or Context only. Select “Why?” on a row, or a badge, for the reason.

Default comparison: North Macedonia, United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands
DimensionNorth MacedoniaUnited KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
Catalogue size Partial768 datasetsNorth Macedonia counts public CKAN datasets.59,491 directory recordsThe United Kingdom counts directory records that link to data hosted elsewhere.590,168 metadata recordsThe United States counts metadata records, including restricted and non-public access levels.20,791 register recordsThe Netherlands counts register records, including non-public and restricted entries.
Publishers / organisations Context only62 active of 132 listedTop five publishers hold 32.3 % of datasets1,176 owners of indexed records (1,044 listed)Top five publishers hold 37.4 % of records107 active of 123 listed; federal sources hold 94.6 % of recordsTop five publishers hold 88.6 % of records26 source catalogues in the CKAN facet; data owners sit in a separate field
Portal type Context onlyNational catalogueCKAN 2.10.9National directory of links to data hosted elsewhereCKANNational metadata catalogue, federal and non-federalRegister of open and non-open government dataCKAN
API availability DirectCKAN Action API, no key; organisation and group lists require POSTCKAN Action API, no keyCatalog API v4; API key requiredCKAN API v3, no key
Machine-readable formats DirectJSON in 0.9 % and CSV in 58.9 % of datasets; 90.78 % of resources machine-readable (project rule)Resource-level indicators are project-definedNot collectedNot collectedJSON in 45.6 % and CSV in 12.0 % of records; controlled EU vocabulary (40 values)
Licensing Partial22.3 % carry an open-licence id; 50.8 % 'not specified'; 27.0 % none37.6 % of records have any license_id; licences may sit in other fieldsNot collected89.6 % carry an open-licence idThe register also contains non-public records
Metadata standard Context onlyDCAT-AP extension installed (mk_dcatap); record exposure not verifiedNot reliably availableDCAT-US 3.0DCAT-AP-DONL
HVD support Not comparable in this selectionNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot collectedEarlier readings are validation only, so no main value is shown
Metadata activity Direct33.6 % of records53.0 % of recordsNot collected81.7 % of records
Count definition Context onlyPublic CKAN packages, anonymous package_searchPublic CKAN packages in the data.gov.uk directorySum of dataset_count over all catalog API organisationsIncludes non-open records.package_search result.count (CKAN API)Includes non-open records.

How to read this comparison

  • Units differ: each portal counts datasets, directory records, metadata records or register records, so read the count-definition row before comparing numbers.
  • The EU portal re-counts records harvested from national and institutional catalogues; its total overlaps national totals and is never ranked with them.
  • Serbia is regional context only and is not part of the core comparison.
  • Themes are not compared across national portals: no cross-country theme mapping is used where a reliable taxonomy crosswalk is unavailable.
  • Research snapshot: 8 October 2026, 22:21–23:03 UTC. Live portals can change after the research snapshot.
Count definitions and comparability limitations are listed for every portal. Explained in methodology